Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: As expected, Finaldi has responded to the estate's request for reimbursement.
The estate seeks $112,960.25.
Wade disputes $64,262.80.
The estate will reply, then the judge will decide a final amount Wade's side must reimburse.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-06-22-Respon ... -Costs.pdf
In 2017-18, original judge sided with estate on nearly every expense.
The main exception last time was the the cost of administering the IME for Wade (via Dr. Pope) was determined largely unrecoverable, around $30k.
Even "best case" for Wade they owe the estate substantially.
In the original 2018 ruling, he granted Finaldi's request to deduct:
- IME Expert Fees ($35,381.36)
- Mutually Agreed Deduction ($2,623.25)
- Some Depo Costs ($6,366.24)
- Service Costs ($1,000)
Which brought the total owed to estate to $68,094.15.
New judge, new arguments...
A hearing has been requested to decide the matter on November 18, 2021.
Between now and then, it is expected we will get one response from the estate and then another reply from Finaldi for the judge to review.
Either way we are looking at another 5 months before the outcome.
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: As expected, Finaldi has responded to the estate's request for reimbursement.
The estate seeks $112,960.25.
Wade disputes $64,262.80.
The estate will reply, then the judge will decide a final amount Wade's side must reimburse.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-06-22-Respon ... -Costs.pdf
In 2017-18, original judge sided with estate on nearly every expense.
The main exception last time was the the cost of administering the IME for Wade (via Dr. Pope) was determined largely unrecoverable, around $30k.
Even "best case" for Wade they owe the estate substantially.
In the original 2018 ruling, he granted Finaldi's request to deduct:
- IME Expert Fees ($35,381.36)
- Mutually Agreed Deduction ($2,623.25)
- Some Depo Costs ($6,366.24)
- Service Costs ($1,000)
Which brought the total owed to estate to $68,094.15.
New judge, new arguments...
A hearing has been requested to decide the matter on November 18, 2021.
Between now and then, it is expected we will get one response from the estate and then another reply from Finaldi for the judge to review.
Either way we are looking at another 5 months before the outcome.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Another part of Taj Jacksons Interview with
@Forbes
france
Taj:" Money is the reason Robson and Safechuck go after the MJ estate. They changed the scenario several times until they could initiate lawsuits against the MJ estate because you cannot attack the deceased. "
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E41zAP3XIAgPNAc?format=jpg&name=small)
@Forbes
france
Taj:" Money is the reason Robson and Safechuck go after the MJ estate. They changed the scenario several times until they could initiate lawsuits against the MJ estate because you cannot attack the deceased. "
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Mister Stip
@fa2stip
Lol, that glorious day when Fakechuck and Flopson BOTH were EXPOSED by Julien's Auctions
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4_tTabXIAUkbnv?format=jpg&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E4_tTsmXMAItiNv?format=jpg&name=large)
TSCM
@MJJRepository
"When Finaldi substituted into the case, he sent an 'open letter' to Estate and press, referencing false reports that MJ had settled claims by 'dozens of little boys' who had all supposedly been 'gagged' by confidentiality agreements."
Finaldi cares nada about truth and facts.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5ACOG8WEAAuimC?format=png&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5ACcEhXoAA5XrQ?format=png&name=medium)
@fa2stip
Lol, that glorious day when Fakechuck and Flopson BOTH were EXPOSED by Julien's Auctions
TSCM
@MJJRepository
"When Finaldi substituted into the case, he sent an 'open letter' to Estate and press, referencing false reports that MJ had settled claims by 'dozens of little boys' who had all supposedly been 'gagged' by confidentiality agreements."
Finaldi cares nada about truth and facts.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: 62 day extension for Finaldi to file opening brief.
In another "no surprise to anyone" move, Finaldi has requested a two month extension in Wade's appeals.
The new filing deadline is Sept. 7.
Safechuck's deadline is July 26, but could get extended.
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: 62 day extension for Finaldi to file opening brief.
In another "no surprise to anyone" move, Finaldi has requested a two month extension in Wade's appeals.
The new filing deadline is Sept. 7.
Safechuck's deadline is July 26, but could get extended.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
So important to remember this. This guy was the catalyst for many injustices.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E5gz5X9VIAAyWg2?format=jpg&name=large)
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
JAMES & WADE APPEALS UPDATE: Yawn.
Safechuck - A 3rd extension has been granted. Finaldi has until 08/25 to file his opening brief, after 121 days of delays.
Robson - Both sides have agreed to merge Wade's two pending appeals into the same case (sanctions and summary judgment).
@MJJRepository
JAMES & WADE APPEALS UPDATE: Yawn.
Safechuck - A 3rd extension has been granted. Finaldi has until 08/25 to file his opening brief, after 121 days of delays.
Robson - Both sides have agreed to merge Wade's two pending appeals into the same case (sanctions and summary judgment).
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Another Finaldi extension.
The final deadline to submit James' opening brief is 09/24/21.
The court advised there will be no further delay; 3 extensions (121 days).
This is 1 year from when Finaldi was eviscerated in court re: Wade's case & sanctions.
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Another Finaldi extension.
The final deadline to submit James' opening brief is 09/24/21.
The court advised there will be no further delay; 3 extensions (121 days).
This is 1 year from when Finaldi was eviscerated in court re: Wade's case & sanctions.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Last year at this time, Dan was embarking on international travels amid a global pandemic. All for the purpose of documenting what he thought would be a major Wade/James victory.
Instead he was subpoenaed, Finaldi sanctioned, all rulings against them & cases tossed yet again
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_WPRbPXoAYOFNk?format=png&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_WQFgVXMAIvXzL?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_WQNEpXsAgkSgE?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_WQUiuWUAwGec3?format=png&name=large)
@MJJRepository
Last year at this time, Dan was embarking on international travels amid a global pandemic. All for the purpose of documenting what he thought would be a major Wade/James victory.
Instead he was subpoenaed, Finaldi sanctioned, all rulings against them & cases tossed yet again
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Finaldi Failed to Submit Opening Brief On Time
The opening brief for James' demurrer appeal was due Sept. 24.
After 121 days of extensions & a "no further extensions" order, Finaldi still failed to submit brief.
The court has alerted him to this fact.
There is usually some leeway to allow filing of late briefs.
However, the fact that he was warned there'd be no further delays due to other pressing business and never advised the court of any cause for delay, is not a good look.
It was due May 26, then July 26, then Sept 24.
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Finaldi Failed to Submit Opening Brief On Time
The opening brief for James' demurrer appeal was due Sept. 24.
After 121 days of extensions & a "no further extensions" order, Finaldi still failed to submit brief.
The court has alerted him to this fact.
There is usually some leeway to allow filing of late briefs.
However, the fact that he was warned there'd be no further delays due to other pressing business and never advised the court of any cause for delay, is not a good look.
It was due May 26, then July 26, then Sept 24.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Wade & James have now lost:
→ 2 cases against estate.
→ 9 amended cases against MJJ Prod. & MJJ Vent.
→ Many motions—one of which led to sanctions of $9,200.
→ James' last appeal via failure to file at all.
What next, recruiting Allred to sue for legal malpractice?
andjustice4some
@andjustice4some
James Safechuck's appeal has been DISMISSED because Finaldi didn't file on time, even though he had THREE extensions! Finaldi will have to appeal the dismissal of his appeal LOL.
@MJJRepository
Wade & James have now lost:
→ 2 cases against estate.
→ 9 amended cases against MJJ Prod. & MJJ Vent.
→ Many motions—one of which led to sanctions of $9,200.
→ James' last appeal via failure to file at all.
What next, recruiting Allred to sue for legal malpractice?
andjustice4some
@andjustice4some
James Safechuck's appeal has been DISMISSED because Finaldi didn't file on time, even though he had THREE extensions! Finaldi will have to appeal the dismissal of his appeal LOL.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Michael Jackson's Final Accuser Case Dismissed by LA Court, "Leaving Neverland" Doc Now Based on Nothing https://showbiz411.com/2021/10/01/micha ... on-nothing via
@showbiz411
@showbiz411
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Here's the verbiage sent to Finaldi. They are still allowing two weeks for him to remedy it.
"Notice of default has issued—Counsel for JS is hereby notified that if the brief is not on file [by Oct. 15] or good cause shown for relief from default, the appeal will be dismissed."
@MJJRepository
Here's the verbiage sent to Finaldi. They are still allowing two weeks for him to remedy it.
"Notice of default has issued—Counsel for JS is hereby notified that if the brief is not on file [by Oct. 15] or good cause shown for relief from default, the appeal will be dismissed."
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
http://mjjforum.com/site/bye-jimmy/
By Jamie Bergen
In a stunning turn of events (lol), James Safechuck’s final appeal has been dismissed.
SAFECHUCK CASE UPDATE:
The appellate court has DISMISSED James' appeal after failing to submit opening brief by Sep. 24 as ordered, after 121 days of extensions.
Finaldi has until Oct. 15 to appeal the dismissal of his appeal.![🤣](//twemoji.maxcdn.com/2/svg/1f923.svg)
He also is still appealing Wade's & sanctions.
— TSCM (@MJJRepository) October 1, 2021
Finaldi didn’t even show up to file his brief! What the hell is even going on? I find it really hard to believe they just gave up. Con artists like Safechuck don’t just pack it in and go away. They do, however, change their plans when things aren’t going their way. Which leads me to wonder if this has something to do with Leaving Neverland 2: Frivious Lawsuit Boogaloo.
The last few times Finaldi has filed his motions or there’s been a hearing, Danny boy has been right there filming. And Finaldi certainly seemed to enjoy hamming it up for Dan’s camera. So why weren’t they there this time? Because they’re filming something else? Maybe they’ve come up with some scam to make the movie more dramatic?
Maybe this is just another stall tactic. Finaldi has been given two more weeks to finally file his brief after eleven months of stalling and extensions, so there’s a good chance he’ll just do it at the very last minute. That would certainly be dramatic.
Here's the verbiage sent to Finaldi. They are still allowing two weeks for him to remedy it.
"Notice of default has issued—Counsel for JS is hereby notified that if the brief is not on file [by Oct. 15] or good cause shown for relief from default, the appeal will be dismissed." pic.twitter.com/X7mRFsXDHa
— TSCM (@MJJRepository) October 1, 2021
Whatever’s going to happen, let’s just enjoy that Safechuck’s dumbass case has been dismissed, for the time being at least. And since it’s now October, let’s celebrate with Thriller!
By Jamie Bergen
In a stunning turn of events (lol), James Safechuck’s final appeal has been dismissed.
SAFECHUCK CASE UPDATE:
The appellate court has DISMISSED James' appeal after failing to submit opening brief by Sep. 24 as ordered, after 121 days of extensions.
Finaldi has until Oct. 15 to appeal the dismissal of his appeal.
He also is still appealing Wade's & sanctions.
— TSCM (@MJJRepository) October 1, 2021
Finaldi didn’t even show up to file his brief! What the hell is even going on? I find it really hard to believe they just gave up. Con artists like Safechuck don’t just pack it in and go away. They do, however, change their plans when things aren’t going their way. Which leads me to wonder if this has something to do with Leaving Neverland 2: Frivious Lawsuit Boogaloo.
The last few times Finaldi has filed his motions or there’s been a hearing, Danny boy has been right there filming. And Finaldi certainly seemed to enjoy hamming it up for Dan’s camera. So why weren’t they there this time? Because they’re filming something else? Maybe they’ve come up with some scam to make the movie more dramatic?
Maybe this is just another stall tactic. Finaldi has been given two more weeks to finally file his brief after eleven months of stalling and extensions, so there’s a good chance he’ll just do it at the very last minute. That would certainly be dramatic.
Here's the verbiage sent to Finaldi. They are still allowing two weeks for him to remedy it.
"Notice of default has issued—Counsel for JS is hereby notified that if the brief is not on file [by Oct. 15] or good cause shown for relief from default, the appeal will be dismissed." pic.twitter.com/X7mRFsXDHa
— TSCM (@MJJRepository) October 1, 2021
Whatever’s going to happen, let’s just enjoy that Safechuck’s dumbass case has been dismissed, for the time being at least. And since it’s now October, let’s celebrate with Thriller!
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
caramella
@Caramelicedtea
Reed lies and claims the lawsuits were chucked out for "procedural reasons", which is false. They claim only the lower level courts have chucked them out. They believe a higher level (SCOTUS?) will let them pass.
caramella
@Caramelicedtea
He claims he tried to "poke holes" in what they were saying by "speaking to the detectives who conducted the MJ investigation." So he spoke to the prosecution side and then called it a day. Groundbreaking journalism.
@MAShow_podcast
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBOt7J-XsAE9emy?format=jpg&name=small)
@Caramelicedtea
Reed lies and claims the lawsuits were chucked out for "procedural reasons", which is false. They claim only the lower level courts have chucked them out. They believe a higher level (SCOTUS?) will let them pass.
caramella
@Caramelicedtea
He claims he tried to "poke holes" in what they were saying by "speaking to the detectives who conducted the MJ investigation." So he spoke to the prosecution side and then called it a day. Groundbreaking journalism.
@MAShow_podcast
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Justice for The Falsely Accused
@JuliaBerkowitz1
Dan Reed 2021 vs Dan Reed 2019. What happened between the two interviews? James Safechuck got exposed with his train station lie, so Reed needed to change the narrative.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBMk1hLXEAYWizc?format=jpg&name=small)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBMk4WqXoAELNDA?format=jpg&name=medium)
@JuliaBerkowitz1
Dan Reed 2021 vs Dan Reed 2019. What happened between the two interviews? James Safechuck got exposed with his train station lie, so Reed needed to change the narrative.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
#MJINNOCENT Official
@MJInnocentUK
Another example of the way race & power work in a society where we are already saturated with images of Black death & anti-Black violence
@MAShow_podcast
Using #MichaelJackson as some kind of caricature in promoting a show featuring two white men tells you all you need to know.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Dan has long established his fact-checking revolved around talking to Robson & Safechuck—w/ confirmation bias from state sources.
He believed the burned items were "the real deal" based entirely on photos supplied by Wade, oblivious to the real merch Wade sold in '11 for huge bucks
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBZPxUyWYAAt7V_?format=jpg&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBZQcc3WQAMvJw6?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBZQktfX0AMYN31?format=jpg&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FBZQos0X0AMdja2?format=jpg&name=medium)
@MJJRepository
Dan has long established his fact-checking revolved around talking to Robson & Safechuck—w/ confirmation bias from state sources.
He believed the burned items were "the real deal" based entirely on photos supplied by Wade, oblivious to the real merch Wade sold in '11 for huge bucks
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Wade once again showing he doesn't have a creative bone in his body, has to copy from the very guy he says abused him. You really couldn't make this up!!!!!!!!!!!!
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
Is the tide starting to turn?
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Finaldi files very late opening brief.
As anticipated, despite missing the 9/24 deadline after 121 days of extensions and delays, and with the court ordering no further delay, Finaldi still delayed another 3 weeks to file just in time of final default.
James has to legally prove the judge was reversibly wrong by dismissing the six causes.
Arguments that must be strong enough to be accepted by at least 2 judges, and no "new evidence" can be presented.
Estate has until 11/15 to respond but most likely will request extension(s).
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Finaldi files very late opening brief.
As anticipated, despite missing the 9/24 deadline after 121 days of extensions and delays, and with the court ordering no further delay, Finaldi still delayed another 3 weeks to file just in time of final default.
James has to legally prove the judge was reversibly wrong by dismissing the six causes.
Arguments that must be strong enough to be accepted by at least 2 judges, and no "new evidence" can be presented.
Estate has until 11/15 to respond but most likely will request extension(s).
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Full brief: https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-10-14-Safech ... -Brief.pdf
The estate will now parse the legal arguments and case law Finaldi referenced, to issue a reply containing their own interpretation of the law. This is tentatively due Nov. 15 but often gets extended.
Then Finaldi will submit a response.
@MJJRepository
Full brief: https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-10-14-Safech ... -Brief.pdf
The estate will now parse the legal arguments and case law Finaldi referenced, to issue a reply containing their own interpretation of the law. This is tentatively due Nov. 15 but often gets extended.
Then Finaldi will submit a response.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Estate's Response Deadline Extended
As anticipated a stipulation has been made allowing two additional months for the estate to submit their response to James' opening appellate brief.
The new deadline is Jan. 14, 2022 but could see another extension.
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Estate's Response Deadline Extended
As anticipated a stipulation has been made allowing two additional months for the estate to submit their response to James' opening appellate brief.
The new deadline is Jan. 14, 2022 but could see another extension.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE REMINDER: Reimbursement Hearing
We'll soon learn the final figure Wade's side owes to the estate, sans appeals.
The estate is seeking $111,460.
Finaldi is trying to reduce it to $47,197.
The prior sit-in judge awarded estate around $70,000.
Hearing Nov. 18.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEYIVnOXoAE0n9P?format=jpg&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEYIW8zX0BgSoLf?format=png&name=large)
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE REMINDER: Reimbursement Hearing
We'll soon learn the final figure Wade's side owes to the estate, sans appeals.
The estate is seeking $111,460.
Finaldi is trying to reduce it to $47,197.
The prior sit-in judge awarded estate around $70,000.
Hearing Nov. 18.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Tentative Order re: Reimbursement
The judge has issued a tentative ruling on the reimbursement costs ahead of tomorrow's hearing.
Estate is awarded ~$75,426.93.
Judge agreed to strike IME fees (not court-appointed), as before.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-11-17-Tentat ... -Costs.pdf
Finaldi wanted to strike cost of travel expense by $12,807.99. The judge only granted him a mere $950 deduction.
"Plaintiff has not shown that the out-of-state travel costs incurred were unreasonable."
"Plaintiff has not provided evidence that these costs are unreasonable."
2018
Estate request: $111,465
Reduced by: $43,371
Final award: $68,094
2021 (Tentative)
Estate request: $112,960
Reduced by: $37,533
Final award: $75,427
Estate succeeded at recovering an extra $7,332.78 by this judge than what their original amount would've been in 2018.
This is separate from the $13,800 Finaldi had to submit last year as part the $9,200 of sanctions for failed protective order (where judge described Finaldi's unprofessional conduct), pending appeal.
It is also separate from the $6,270 he had to pay back to Spence/Fox.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEbxsDdXEAAhvL4?format=png&name=900x900)
The judge has never waivered from his tentative rulings so far in this case.
It is highly unlikely that anything argued at tomorrow's hearing will change for the benefit of either side.
But it's still worth awaiting a final order.
And we also have to wait for appeals to end.
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Tentative Order re: Reimbursement
The judge has issued a tentative ruling on the reimbursement costs ahead of tomorrow's hearing.
Estate is awarded ~$75,426.93.
Judge agreed to strike IME fees (not court-appointed), as before.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2021-11-17-Tentat ... -Costs.pdf
Finaldi wanted to strike cost of travel expense by $12,807.99. The judge only granted him a mere $950 deduction.
"Plaintiff has not shown that the out-of-state travel costs incurred were unreasonable."
"Plaintiff has not provided evidence that these costs are unreasonable."
2018
Estate request: $111,465
Reduced by: $43,371
Final award: $68,094
2021 (Tentative)
Estate request: $112,960
Reduced by: $37,533
Final award: $75,427
Estate succeeded at recovering an extra $7,332.78 by this judge than what their original amount would've been in 2018.
This is separate from the $13,800 Finaldi had to submit last year as part the $9,200 of sanctions for failed protective order (where judge described Finaldi's unprofessional conduct), pending appeal.
It is also separate from the $6,270 he had to pay back to Spence/Fox.
The judge has never waivered from his tentative rulings so far in this case.
It is highly unlikely that anything argued at tomorrow's hearing will change for the benefit of either side.
But it's still worth awaiting a final order.
And we also have to wait for appeals to end.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Final Order for Reimbursement Man judge
At today's hearing, neither side contested judge's findings. Order from last night will stand.
The estate is entitled to $75,426.93 reimbursement from Wade's side.
$7.3K more than they were awarded in 2018. A solid win!
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Final Order for Reimbursement Man judge
At today's hearing, neither side contested judge's findings. Order from last night will stand.
The estate is entitled to $75,426.93 reimbursement from Wade's side.
$7.3K more than they were awarded in 2018. A solid win!
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
andjustice4some
@andjustice4some
Just want to clarify that Wade Robson will have to pay this bill of $75k by himself. Even though this is a contingency case, Robson is the person who owes the debt. twitter.com/MJJRepository
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FEfohALVIAY_2Yw?format=png&name=small)
@andjustice4some
Just want to clarify that Wade Robson will have to pay this bill of $75k by himself. Even though this is a contingency case, Robson is the person who owes the debt. twitter.com/MJJRepository
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Perfect quote from Branca:
"No discredited infomercial for a failing lawsuit against a man declared innocent in life is ever going to change that."
Note that Dan's infomercial left out how the two men had filed not one, not two, but 11 different versions of $ lawsuits in 5 yrs.
Quote Tweet
MJJJusticeProject #1Billion4MJ
@MJJJusticePrjct
· 11h
"Ten yrs later [..] with new generations embracing the legacy of his Cultural contributions& the elegance of his artistry as passionately as ever. No discredited informercial for a failing lawsuit against a man declared innocent in life is ever going to change that." @JamesFHall
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FGmBk9dUcAEwxWW?format=png&name=small)
@MJJRepository
Perfect quote from Branca:
"No discredited infomercial for a failing lawsuit against a man declared innocent in life is ever going to change that."
Note that Dan's infomercial left out how the two men had filed not one, not two, but 11 different versions of $ lawsuits in 5 yrs.
Quote Tweet
MJJJusticeProject #1Billion4MJ
@MJJJusticePrjct
· 11h
"Ten yrs later [..] with new generations embracing the legacy of his Cultural contributions& the elegance of his artistry as passionately as ever. No discredited informercial for a failing lawsuit against a man declared innocent in life is ever going to change that." @JamesFHall
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
#MJStory
@MJISRL
Looks like another item survived Wade Robson's staged scene of burning cheap MJ memorabilia. A fake glove triggered him enough to set on fire in LN, but a genuine signed picture 'taken days before' his alleged abuse is valuable enough to keep.
https://en.mjstory.co.il/post/twenty-five-lies-in-ln
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIm_qsfXEAEgumB?format=jpg&name=small)
Justice for The Falsely Accused
@JuliaBerkowitz1
This particular online course that he promotes here using MJ's handwriting for attention costs $200 per person. Mind you, he's not a professional therapist. He has no qualifications at all. Everything he does confirms that he's using his fake "victimhood" as a career prospect.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIoplBMUcAAbuCj?format=jpg&name=small)
#MJInnocentRaised fistOfficial
@MJInnocentUK
All for that privilege of $200 to hear lies someone who should really be behind bars.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIm057UXIAUi6V1?format=jpg&name=900x900)
More evidence #WadeRobson can't keep his story straight
Photo taken DAYS before? He said they met him on Friday in the studio - that's when they went to Neverland then the second day he was molested
How come he kept this photo when he said he burned everything MJ related
MJJJusticeProject #1Billion4MJ
@MJJJusticePrjct
not only kept the photo, but after claiming in Reed's fictiondoc that he had burned ALL things that reminded him of his "abuse"- he post it up as PR for his "spiritual healing" guru schtick - LOL What a complete an utter foolio - just blasted his own narrative out of the water.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIonDFHXIAEnpB-?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)
@MJISRL
Looks like another item survived Wade Robson's staged scene of burning cheap MJ memorabilia. A fake glove triggered him enough to set on fire in LN, but a genuine signed picture 'taken days before' his alleged abuse is valuable enough to keep.
https://en.mjstory.co.il/post/twenty-five-lies-in-ln
Justice for The Falsely Accused
@JuliaBerkowitz1
This particular online course that he promotes here using MJ's handwriting for attention costs $200 per person. Mind you, he's not a professional therapist. He has no qualifications at all. Everything he does confirms that he's using his fake "victimhood" as a career prospect.
#MJInnocentRaised fistOfficial
@MJInnocentUK
All for that privilege of $200 to hear lies someone who should really be behind bars.
More evidence #WadeRobson can't keep his story straight
Photo taken DAYS before? He said they met him on Friday in the studio - that's when they went to Neverland then the second day he was molested
How come he kept this photo when he said he burned everything MJ related
MJJJusticeProject #1Billion4MJ
@MJJJusticePrjct
not only kept the photo, but after claiming in Reed's fictiondoc that he had burned ALL things that reminded him of his "abuse"- he post it up as PR for his "spiritual healing" guru schtick - LOL What a complete an utter foolio - just blasted his own narrative out of the water.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK CASE UPDATE:
As of this writing, the estate hasn't requested a 3rd full extension (unlike Finaldi).
If this remains as-is, we can expect them to submit their response brief no later than around February 9th, per California law.
After that, Finaldi will write a reply.
And to be clear, I refer to "Finaldi" with respect to Wade/James' filings since he's the chief attorney representing them since 2016.
However, for appeals he has always used Holly Noelle Boyer as the lead to do the court filings, since she specializes more in appellate matters.
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK CASE UPDATE:
As of this writing, the estate hasn't requested a 3rd full extension (unlike Finaldi).
If this remains as-is, we can expect them to submit their response brief no later than around February 9th, per California law.
After that, Finaldi will write a reply.
And to be clear, I refer to "Finaldi" with respect to Wade/James' filings since he's the chief attorney representing them since 2016.
However, for appeals he has always used Holly Noelle Boyer as the lead to do the court filings, since she specializes more in appellate matters.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Estate files their response to latest appeal
I'll post a complete rundown of the brief and exhibits Thu-Fri.
Finaldi's side will have chance to reply. Then oral arguments will be set.
Well, we're 1 filing closer to closure of these relentless appeals.
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Estate files their response to latest appeal
I'll post a complete rundown of the brief and exhibits Thu-Fri.
Finaldi's side will have chance to reply. Then oral arguments will be set.
Well, we're 1 filing closer to closure of these relentless appeals.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Replying to
@YulifanofMJ
Safechuck & Robson are appealing their final dismissals.
If the courts do not reverse their losses, they may try to appeal "en banc" to all appellate judges, but that is very rare to be granted.
They can then try to petition to the supreme court but very unlikely to be heard.
@MJJRepository
Replying to
@YulifanofMJ
Safechuck & Robson are appealing their final dismissals.
If the courts do not reverse their losses, they may try to appeal "en banc" to all appellate judges, but that is very rare to be granted.
They can then try to petition to the supreme court but very unlikely to be heard.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Preview of the estate's response.
JS offers no proof of employment in 88-92. This claim was only added after 1st amended complaint purely to fake 'special relationship' for case.
ESTATE—Employees are not typically paid with random provisions of travel, lodging, and the like.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRBAkiXsAE8xiL?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRBFwmXsAMHSAF?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRC4KDWYAI7d3z?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRDH1TWUAwXEVv?format=jpg&name=medium)
@MJJRepository
Preview of the estate's response.
JS offers no proof of employment in 88-92. This claim was only added after 1st amended complaint purely to fake 'special relationship' for case.
ESTATE—Employees are not typically paid with random provisions of travel, lodging, and the like.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
Many references to James' parents in filing. They kickstarted the bond (sending 1st letter to MJ, inviting him to Thanksgiving, picking him up). Similar to Robsons.
But don't name them as defendants. Just go after MJ's lucrative companies and ordinary staffers who sent fan-mail.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRu84XXIAIV74c?format=jpg&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRvA0ZXMAA8B7O?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRvMTCXsAET_8T?format=jpg&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLRwdxnXsAMn8SU?format=png&name=900x900)
@MJJRepository
Many references to James' parents in filing. They kickstarted the bond (sending 1st letter to MJ, inviting him to Thanksgiving, picking him up). Similar to Robsons.
But don't name them as defendants. Just go after MJ's lucrative companies and ordinary staffers who sent fan-mail.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM@MJJRepositoryWADE ROBSON CASE UPDATE: Extension
Wade's been granted a 60 day extension to file his opening appellate brief—due May 13, 2022.
This new date, which may be extended, exceeds 9 YEARS since he first began civil litigation for financial gain.
3,300 days of
-motivated lawsuits.
Wade's been granted a 60 day extension to file his opening appellate brief—due May 13, 2022.
This new date, which may be extended, exceeds 9 YEARS since he first began civil litigation for financial gain.
3,300 days of
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: Another extension.
Wade's side requested an extra month to file their brief. The new deadline would be June 13, 2022.
That date would make 17 years since MJ was 14x exonerated in criminal court & more than 9 years since Wade began his civil litigation...
@MJJRepository
ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: Another extension.
Wade's side requested an extra month to file their brief. The new deadline would be June 13, 2022.
That date would make 17 years since MJ was 14x exonerated in criminal court & more than 9 years since Wade began his civil litigation...
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM
@MJJRepository
WADE/JAMES APPEAL STATUS: Not much until July.![⌚](//twemoji.maxcdn.com/2/svg/231a.svg)
James received another 30 day extension for reply brief, now due July 1 (originally due March 1).
Wade's opening brief is due June 13, but attorneys will likely wait until final notice + 2 week courtesy to file sometime in July.
@MJJRepository
WADE/JAMES APPEAL STATUS: Not much until July.
James received another 30 day extension for reply brief, now due July 1 (originally due March 1).
Wade's opening brief is due June 13, but attorneys will likely wait until final notice + 2 week courtesy to file sometime in July.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: Opening brief to be filed within 15 days.
Like last time, Wade's side requested the max extensions & waited until final notice. They have until about July 5 to file.
Expect similar arguments and irrelevant quotes from depositions just like last time.
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON APPEALS UPDATE: Opening brief to be filed within 15 days.
Like last time, Wade's side requested the max extensions & waited until final notice. They have until about July 5 to file.
Expect similar arguments and irrelevant quotes from depositions just like last time.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
Finaldi 2016: "if [Chandlers] wish not to discuss it that should be their right. We are in no way suggesting they be forced."
Finaldi 2022: Lily, Marks, Jordan have no right to privacy! Court was wrong. We want to compel them to speak even if they told us to stop harassing them!
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXVqlf5X0AUTDX9?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXVqm40X0AA2Lg6?format=png&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXVqrxKWAAA0PSy?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXVq53wWYAcs6Rn?format=png&name=900x900)
@MJJRepository
Finaldi 2016: "if [Chandlers] wish not to discuss it that should be their right. We are in no way suggesting they be forced."
Finaldi 2022: Lily, Marks, Jordan have no right to privacy! Court was wrong. We want to compel them to speak even if they told us to stop harassing them!
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
WADE AND JAMES APPEALS UPDATES:
The court will be consolidating both cases for oral arguments (as they did in 2019) and has proposed consolidating both cases for a single final opinion as well.
Estate now has until October 3 to reply to Wade's brief, but may request more time.
The consolidation of cases for a single ruling is controversial and was opposed by estate the last time.
This is because each case is very unique even though Finaldi pretends they are identical (and with same causes of action).
Wade's was summary judgment, James' was demurrer.
At the trial level each case was separate. This is what allowed estate to approach using different arguments and strategies.
At last appellate level, the court ruled only on AB 218 that reversed the statute of limitations. There was no in-depth consolidated opinion on causes.
With James' appeal fully briefed and Wade's still pending in briefs, it is unlikely we'll see much more activity in these cases until late this year or into the next.
Estate has to comb through Wade's 94 page opening brief and 58 cases citations to respond once again, as before.
@MJJRepository
WADE AND JAMES APPEALS UPDATES:
The court will be consolidating both cases for oral arguments (as they did in 2019) and has proposed consolidating both cases for a single final opinion as well.
Estate now has until October 3 to reply to Wade's brief, but may request more time.
The consolidation of cases for a single ruling is controversial and was opposed by estate the last time.
This is because each case is very unique even though Finaldi pretends they are identical (and with same causes of action).
Wade's was summary judgment, James' was demurrer.
At the trial level each case was separate. This is what allowed estate to approach using different arguments and strategies.
At last appellate level, the court ruled only on AB 218 that reversed the statute of limitations. There was no in-depth consolidated opinion on causes.
With James' appeal fully briefed and Wade's still pending in briefs, it is unlikely we'll see much more activity in these cases until late this year or into the next.
Estate has to comb through Wade's 94 page opening brief and 58 cases citations to respond once again, as before.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
As part of Wade's latest appeal, Finaldi argues that neither estate nor trial court ever conducted Rowland analysis to determine duty of care matter.
But in Judge Young's 2020 dismissal of Safechuck's case, he notes it was Finaldi's side that failed to factor Rowland analysis.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYDhmiWWYAA8GxN?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYDhxzLXkAE4lS0?format=png&name=medium)
@MJJRepository
As part of Wade's latest appeal, Finaldi argues that neither estate nor trial court ever conducted Rowland analysis to determine duty of care matter.
But in Judge Young's 2020 dismissal of Safechuck's case, he notes it was Finaldi's side that failed to factor Rowland analysis.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
WADE APPEALS UPDATE:
Lily Chandler (JC's younger sister) & Tabitha Marks (JC's ex) have requested the same extension as estate to file their response (Oct. 3).
Yes. These two non-parties are—FOR THE 6TH YEAR—still forced to argue Finaldi's repeatedly rejected motions for depo.
Despite the pleads of Lily, Tabitha, Jordan & Spence to leave them alone—they have nothing of relevance to assist Wade/James—Finaldi continues.
Finaldi calls them all "crucial and essential" to Wade's claims even in the face of their own declarations and proof to the contrary.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSTAyCWIAQYODj?format=png&name=900x900)
So what about respecting one's privacy?
In original correspondence, Finaldi said he'd honor those who didn't want to be involved.
But now he insists they have no right to privacy given their own opposition to his persistence & the publicity of the Chandler scandal 29 years ago.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSUusPXEAAxTOL?format=png&name=large)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSU8xpWIAIATAK?format=png&name=900x900)
"[Wade]'s persistent harassment and attempts to invade Ms. Chandler's and Ms. Marks' privacy directly contradicted representations made by [Wade]'s counsel in July 2016.
The word "harassment" and "bullying" by Wade's side has been used by many witnesses (deposed and attempted).
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSViK8WAAA1_o2?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSWGuHWYAICp_5?format=jpg&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSWYj0XkAI8rYM?format=png&name=900x900)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSX5PyXgAADd6y?format=png&name=medium)
On Oct. 4, 2016 an attorney for Jordan sent a letter to Finaldi expressing "neither he nor any members of his family or Ms. Marks wish to be involved in this matter."
But rather than honoring their request as he implied he would, Finaldi has now spent 2,130 MORE DAYS in pursuit.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSZPamXgAY6E0e?format=png&name=medium)
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSZRzVX0AADaDj?format=png&name=medium)
These non-parties have spent more than ½ decade and $1000s contesting what Spence called a desperate needle-in-a-haystack fishing expedition for cases built on straw.
A tactic plucked directly from Sneddon to attempt bolstering of weak cases by spewing a lot of unrelated drivel.
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZSa3jbXEAQHfpq?format=jpg&name=medium)
Guilters insist MJ's side harasses the Chandlers but it's 100% their side doing it.
What victim advocate would say a "global hunt" is on to find a party who told them 9 months prior to stop: "We're not going to stop until we find Jordan. We are looking for him in many places..."
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FZScOooXgAEdenq?format=jpg&name=large)
@MJJRepository
WADE APPEALS UPDATE:
Lily Chandler (JC's younger sister) & Tabitha Marks (JC's ex) have requested the same extension as estate to file their response (Oct. 3).
Yes. These two non-parties are—FOR THE 6TH YEAR—still forced to argue Finaldi's repeatedly rejected motions for depo.
Despite the pleads of Lily, Tabitha, Jordan & Spence to leave them alone—they have nothing of relevance to assist Wade/James—Finaldi continues.
Finaldi calls them all "crucial and essential" to Wade's claims even in the face of their own declarations and proof to the contrary.
So what about respecting one's privacy?
In original correspondence, Finaldi said he'd honor those who didn't want to be involved.
But now he insists they have no right to privacy given their own opposition to his persistence & the publicity of the Chandler scandal 29 years ago.
"[Wade]'s persistent harassment and attempts to invade Ms. Chandler's and Ms. Marks' privacy directly contradicted representations made by [Wade]'s counsel in July 2016.
The word "harassment" and "bullying" by Wade's side has been used by many witnesses (deposed and attempted).
On Oct. 4, 2016 an attorney for Jordan sent a letter to Finaldi expressing "neither he nor any members of his family or Ms. Marks wish to be involved in this matter."
But rather than honoring their request as he implied he would, Finaldi has now spent 2,130 MORE DAYS in pursuit.
These non-parties have spent more than ½ decade and $1000s contesting what Spence called a desperate needle-in-a-haystack fishing expedition for cases built on straw.
A tactic plucked directly from Sneddon to attempt bolstering of weak cases by spewing a lot of unrelated drivel.
Guilters insist MJ's side harasses the Chandlers but it's 100% their side doing it.
What victim advocate would say a "global hunt" is on to find a party who told them 9 months prior to stop: "We're not going to stop until we find Jordan. We are looking for him in many places..."
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
Oct 14
Lily & Tabitha have now exhausted 6 YEARS of time and money fighting the "continuous attacks and harassment" by Robson/Finaldi on their "meritless endeavor to take depos of non-parties."
Guilters—remind me again how these men are victim advocates? Who are the ones harassing who?
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fe_qtwfXoAAXuEP?format=png&name=small)
@MJJRepository
Oct 14
Lily & Tabitha have now exhausted 6 YEARS of time and money fighting the "continuous attacks and harassment" by Robson/Finaldi on their "meritless endeavor to take depos of non-parties."
Guilters—remind me again how these men are victim advocates? Who are the ones harassing who?
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE DOWNLOAD: Estate's Response Brief
Below is the full 17,979 word respondent's brief filed by the estate this week, in response to Wade's latest appeals effort.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2022-12-08-Repson ... sitory.pdf
NEXT STEPS: Wade will reply, then oral arguments will be scheduled and heard.
@MJJRepository
WADE ROBSON CASE DOWNLOAD: Estate's Response Brief
Below is the full 17,979 word respondent's brief filed by the estate this week, in response to Wade's latest appeals effort.
https://mjjr.net/docs/2022-12-08-Repson ... sitory.pdf
NEXT STEPS: Wade will reply, then oral arguments will be scheduled and heard.
- soulmum
- Utente certificato
- Messaggi: 9304
- Iscritto il: 31 maggio 2016, 12:43
Re: Robson, Safechuck file claim of abuse with estate
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Another delay granted.
James filed another month extension to reply to the estate's response. Now his reply is not due until March 29, and really has until mid-April to file unless seeking another delay.
James is on day 3,210 of seeking litigation.
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
Replying to
@MJJRepository
EDIT - Correction, this is Robson's reply brief.
James' litigation is pending the conclusion of Wade's so they both will be joined together for oral arguments.
Wade is on day 3,580 of his "not about money" litigation.
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
It has been over a year since Wade's case was dismissed by a second judge and he was ordered to pay $75,426.93 to the estate in reimbursement.
Remind me again, how many media outlets that were so interested in Wade's story in 2019 followed up to report this detail?
Yes. In Wade's case specifically it was already ordered in December 2021 that he would have to pay the estate $75,426.93. But you won't see the media mention that.
If Wade loses, the additional appeals fees can also be requested by the estate, but may not always be granted
![Immagine](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FpNrdhpWYAIeKWV?format=png&name=small)
@MJJRepository
SAFECHUCK APPEALS UPDATE: Another delay granted.
James filed another month extension to reply to the estate's response. Now his reply is not due until March 29, and really has until mid-April to file unless seeking another delay.
James is on day 3,210 of seeking litigation.
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
Replying to
@MJJRepository
EDIT - Correction, this is Robson's reply brief.
James' litigation is pending the conclusion of Wade's so they both will be joined together for oral arguments.
Wade is on day 3,580 of his "not about money" litigation.
TSCM - MJ Case Facts and Commentary
@MJJRepository
It has been over a year since Wade's case was dismissed by a second judge and he was ordered to pay $75,426.93 to the estate in reimbursement.
Remind me again, how many media outlets that were so interested in Wade's story in 2019 followed up to report this detail?
Yes. In Wade's case specifically it was already ordered in December 2021 that he would have to pay the estate $75,426.93. But you won't see the media mention that.
If Wade loses, the additional appeals fees can also be requested by the estate, but may not always be granted